Engineer comparing cross-cycle inspection trends on a tablet beside a desert pipeline
SCENARIOS · ILI
CORROSION ENGINEERINTEGRITY MANAGER

Cross-cycle ILI anomaly matching

Match the same defect across runs, rank by real risk, and reach an actionable dig list in minutes, not a quarter of spreadsheet review.

[ MEASURABLE OUTCOME ]
10 min
cross-cycle defect matching
down from 4–8 weeks
95%
less manual effort
on ERF calculation
30 days
earlier warning on anomalies
at risk of missing the 180-day window
[ BEFORE / AFTER ]

Today

140 to 210 hours per ILI project.
—

ERF calculations for hundreds of anomalies run by hand in Excel, 140 to 210 hours per ILI project.

—

Matching this run against the last one takes weeks. Decision files scatter across email and SharePoint.

With Winda

Two uploads, ten minutes.
✓

Two ILI uploads and Winda matches the same defect across runs automatically, then generates growth rate in ten minutes.

✓

ERF runs on your acceptance matrix with the reasoning attached. A 30-day early warning flags anomalies at risk of missing the window.

[ WHY WINDA CAN DO IT ]
See the full stack →
[ PROOF ]

"Winda matched two ILI runs in ten minutes. We used to spend a month doing it by hand in Excel."

Asset Integrity Director · National Oil Company
Representative of a Winda engagement

Bring us your last ILI run.

Two runs, ten minutes, and you'll see the dig list Winda builds, with the reasoning attached.

Bring us your last ILI run → See how we engage →